MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2763514058 · doi:10.1093/pch/19.6.e35-198

203: The Use of Internet for Children's Health Information By Parents at a Canadian Tertiary Health Institution

2014· article· en· W2763514058 on OpenAlexaffabout
Carolyne Pehora, N Garaga, Melyssa Stoute, R Serebali, CT Matava

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe InternetMedicineFamily medicinePublic healthPsychologyNursingWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of the Internet to search for medical and health related information is increasing and associated with concerns around quality and safety. We investigated the current use and perceptions of reliable websites for children's health information by parents. The objectives of our study were to determine: Patterns of Internet use by parents for their child's health information Types of devices used to access information around child's health Perceived reliability of websites and cross-corroboration of information Future uses of Internet for child's health information Following institutional ethics approval we conducted a survey of 146 parents/guardians of children presenting for day surgery with a 95% CI and 8% margin of error. A 20-item survey instrument developed and tested by the investigators was administered. Consent for participation in the study was implied by completion of the survey. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. The majority (143 of 146 [98%]) of parents/guardians used the Internet to search for information around their child's health. Eighty percent of respondents reported using public search engines as their first resource while less than 20% used university/hospital based websites (Figure 1). Common conditions such as colds/flu, skin conditions and fever were the most frequently searched and unique conditions directly affecting the child were second (Figure 2). Despite low usage levels of university/hospital based websites for child's health information, the majority of parents/guardians (74%) regarded these as providing safe, accurate and reliable information. In contrast, only 24% of respondents regarded public search engines as providing safe and reliable information. Interestingly 50% of parents/guardians cross-checked information found on the internet with the family physician. An unprecedented majority of parents/guardians are using the internet for their child's health information. Of concern is that parents/guardians are currently not using reliable and safe sources of information. Health care providers should begin to focus on improving access to safe, accurate and reliable information for parents and guardians through various modalities including education, design for multiplatform and incorporation of ‘safe seals’ and better search engine optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility→French-language works237,207→