MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2763570476 · doi:10.7564/14-ijwg78

Assessing Adaptive Transboundary Governance Capacity in the Great Lakes Basin: The Role of Institutions and Networks

2016· article· en· W2763570476 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Debora L. VanNijnatten, Carolyn Johns, Kathryn Bryk Friedman, Gail Krantzberg

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Water Governance · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransboundary Water Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyStructural basinWatershedSustainabilityRecreationHuman settlementEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementEcologyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction The Great Lakes St. Lawrence River Basin is the largest freshwater basin on earth, containing roughly 20 percent of the world’s surface freshwater. The Great Lakes is a highly complex ecosystem, composed of interrelated open water, shoreline and upper watershed systems, which support a high level of biological diversity. Collectively, the five lakes and their draining river systems span two provinces, eight states, more than forty ‘First Nations/Tribes’ and hundreds of municipalities. The Basin has played a major role in the economic development of the United States and Canada. It continues to provide water for domestic consumption, industry, transportation, power, recreation, and a host of other uses. However, the Great Lakes Basin is under siege. Invasive species, climate change, economic decline, urban sprawl, and chemical and biological contaminants threaten the health and vitality of this ecosystem. Despite numerous initiatives to remedy these varying threats, the environmental sustainability of the basin remains an important public policy and transboundary governance challenge. ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Water GovernanceSame topicTransboundary Water Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207