MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2763576012 · doi:10.1115/omae2017-61300

Comparison of Riser and Well System Response Predictions to Full-Scale Measurements in a Shallow Water Harsh Environment

2017· article· en· W2763576012 on OpenAlex
Karen M. Walker, Puneet Agarwal, Scot McNeill, Kenneth Bhalla, David Baker, Haining Zheng

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHibernia Management and Development Company
KeywordsMarine engineeringDrilling riserDrillingFull scaleEngineeringOffshore drillingSubmarine pipelineCurrent (fluid)System of measurementScale (ratio)Environmental scienceMechanical engineeringGeotechnical engineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Well system fatigue accumulated during drilling operations from mobile offshore drilling units (MODUs) has been a topic of intensive study in recent literature. A variety of efforts from individual operator studies to industry-wide joint industry projects have been launched in an effort to improve understanding of both the load and resistance elements of well system fatigue assessment. A key uncertainty in current predictive modeling practice is the level of conservatism inherent in that modeling, as compared to real-life system response. Collection of good quality, full-scale field measurement data is a key component in evaluating this uncertainty. A full-scale measurement campaign was recently conducted on a 6th generation MODU during drilling operations in a shallow water region with a harsh environment. The measurement system on board the vessel captured vessel, riser and lower marine riser package (LMRP) accelerations and angular rates, along with riser tensioner pressures. Concurrent environmental measurements were acquired via wave rider buoy and acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) located near the mobile offshore drilling unit (MODU), capturing wave height, period and direction, and full-depth current profiles. This paper focuses on data collected for one well during the winter months where significant wave heights at the drilling site varied from 6ft to 26ft. In this paper, a comparison between measured and predicted riser and well system loading is presented. The predicted riser and well system response is based upon global riser analyses performed in both the frequency and time domains to evaluate the effect of linearization in the modeling process. Loading demand on the well system is also presented as cycle-range histograms. This paper also summarizes the conclusions from the comparisons of these measurements with other published measurement campaign data. While loading derived from previous riser analysis studies have been found to be “conservative” as compared to full-scale measurements, this study finds that the predicted and measured responses match quite well. Furthermore, it is also shown that the frequency domain results are adequate for this study, suggesting that the nonlinearity within the riser and well system for the conditions studied is relatively minor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207