« Seuls les marxistes aiment le passé » : le tiers-mondisme de Pier Paolo Pasolini dans le genre des appunti
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pasolini conçoit en 1968 un projet de film intitulé Notes pour un poème sur le tiers-monde (Appunti per un poema sul Terzo Mondo), constitué d’une série de courts et de moyens métrages en forme de « notes » mêlant fiction et documentaire. Comme d’autres expérimentations avant-gardistes de l’époque, le genre des appunti que pratique Pasolini se situe à l’intersection de différentes formes filmiques, dont le documentaire ethnographique autoréflexif, le récit de voyage expérimental et l’essai cinématographique. Pour Pasolini, aller tourner dans le tiers-monde représente un moyen d’explorer le projet politique du mouvement des pays non alignés issu de la conférence de Bandung et le désir de l’artiste engagé de trouver dans les luttes de libération un espace de changement politique radical, une révolution da farsi. La forme essayiste, ouverte, des appunti de Pasolini vise précisément à reproduire dans sa propre structure hybride l’ouverture du mouvement révolutionnaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".