MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2763669377 · doi:10.1109/ccta.2017.8062577

Double-Sided kernel observer for linear time-varying systems

2017· article· en· W2763669377 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2017 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservableObserver (physics)Kernel (algebra)Linear systemEstimatorMathematicsNonlinear systemRepresentation (politics)State (computer science)Control theory (sociology)State observerApplied mathematicsComputer scienceAlgorithmDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysisStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A double-sided input-output kernel functional representation is developed for the class of totally observable linear time-varying systems with inputs. The double-sided kernel representation is immediately applicable as part of a non-asymptotic state observer for observable LTV systems. In the absence of output measurement noise the observer provides exact state values of the system state in arbitrarily short time. It also shares the usual superior features of algebraic observers such as independence of the initial conditions of the system and good noise attenuation properties. Other advantages of the double-sided input-output kernel functional representation of linear systems are elucidated as the concept can be employed to construct state and parameter estimators for flat nonlinear systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it