A Scalable Successive-Cancellation Decoder for Polar Codes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polar codes are the first error-correcting codes to provably achieve channel capacity, asymptotically in code length, with an explicit construction. However, under successive-cancellation decoding, polar codes require very long code lengths to compete with existing modern codes. Nonetheless, the successive cancellation algorithm enables very-low-complexity implementations in hardware, due to the regular structure exhibited by polar codes. In this paper, we present an improved architecture for successive-cancellation decoding of polar codes, making use of a novel semi-parallel, encoder-based partial-sum computation module. We also provide quantization results for realistic code length N=2 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">15</sup> , and explore various optimization techniques such as a chained processing element and a variable quantization scheme. This design is shown to scale to code lengths of up to N=2 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">21</sup> , enabled by its low logic use, low register use and simple datapaths, limited almost exclusively by the amount of available SRAM. It also supports an overlapped loading of frames, allowing full-throughput decoding with a single set of input buffers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it