Construction of solutions and asymptotics for the sine-Gordon equation in the quarter plane
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider the sine-Gordon equation in laboratory coordinates in the quarter plane. The first part of the paper considers the construction of solutions via Riemann-Hilbert techniques. In addition to constructing solutions starting from given initial and boundary values, we also construct solutions starting from an independent set of spectral (scattering) data. The second part of the paper establishes asymptotic formulas for the quarter-plane solution $u(x,t)$ as $(x,t) \to \infty$. Assuming that $u(x,0)$ and $u(0,t)$ approach integer multiples of $2π$ as $x \to \infty$ and $t \to \infty$, respectively, we show that the asymptotic behavior is described by four asymptotic sectors. In the first sector (characterized by $x/t \geq 1$), the solution approaches a multiple of $2π$ as $x \to \infty$. In the third sector (characterized by $0 \leq x/t \leq 1$ and $t|x-t| \to \infty$), the solution asymptotes to a train of solitons superimposed on a radiation background. The second sector (characterized by $0 \leq x/t \leq 1$ and $x/t \to 1$) is a transition region and the fourth sector (characterized by $x/t \to 0$) is a boundary region. We derive precise asymptotic formulas in all sectors. In particular, we describe the interaction between the asymptotic solitons and the radiation background, and derive a formula for the solution's topological charge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".