Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article vise a mieux comprendre l’impact de la mondialisation et des ideologies linguistiques sur la construction identitaire ainsi que sur les pratiques langagieres, en definissant ce que constitue l’identite d’un/e Francophone. Il s’agit des processus d’identification vis-a-vis les discours au sujet du plurilinguisme et de la citoyennete a travers la voix de cinq jeunes d’origine italienne dans l’espace urbain, global et multiculturel de Toronto (Canada), qui sont actuellement etudiants universitaires effectuant ou ayant effectue des etudes en francais et qui sont egalement en train de completer une formation a fin de devenir enseignants de francais. Ce travail propose une reflexion critique sur la construction identitaire des Francophones au Canada et souligne l’importance de nouveaux espaces discursifs au sein desquels il est possible de gerer les tensions dans les rapports majoritaires/ minoritaires, mais aussi pour permettre l'emergence d'identites imbriquees, ce qui cree la possibilite de remettre en question les modalites d’appartenance a la francophonie au Canada ou ailleurs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".