MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2764029922 · doi:10.24870/cjb.2017-a58

Potential role of TIGAR in OSCC: tumorigenesis and survival

2017· article· en· W2764029922 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Omprakash Shriwas, P. V. Giri Prasad, Rupesh Dash

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Biotechnology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarcinogenesisBiologyCancerGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the improvement of treatment modalities, OSCC remains a prevalent disease in India and 50% of OSCC patients die within 5 years of disease detection. One of the major reasons for treatment failure is imbalances of metabolic profile in cancer. TIGAR (TP53-induced glycolysis and apoptosis regulator), is a p53-inducible protein that functions as fructose-2, 6bisphosphatase and fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase, reducing the glycolytic rate and promoting the Pentose Phosphate Pathway. Consistent with increased activation of the PPP, cells expressing TIGAR have higher NADPH levels and a concomitantly enhanced ability to regulate levels of cellular ROS and thus reduce oxidative stress. Apart from the metabolic function of TIGAR, it has another role in the survival of cancer. Recently found that TIGAR is upregulated in some cancer, the main focus of our proposed study is to find out the potential role of TIGAR in tumorigenesis and survival of OSCC. For this we are using OSCC cell line as well as primary OSCC sample, some our recent finding suggesting that TIGAR is upregulated in OSCC cell line as well as patient sample compared their respective control, and also found that TIGAR knockdown decreases cell viability and drug sensitivity. Our main focus is how TIGAR regulated OSCC cell survival and what mechanism behind this, for this we will use RNA-Seq in TIGAR KD cell and TIGAR OE cell and found that how many pathway or which gene is affecting when targeting TIGAR. So overall our findings prove that TIGAR has some role in the survival of OSCC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Biotechnology→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→