MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2764043824 · doi:10.33679/rfn.v3i6.1602

El tratado de libre comercio en América del norte y el medio ambiente de la frontera norte

2017· article· es· W2764043824 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontera norte · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeography and Environmental Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesGeographyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La atención recibida por los problemas ambientales de la frontera norte durante la actual negociación del Tratado de Libre Comercio (TLC) entre México, Estados Unidos y Canadá ha conferido a este tema una importancia nunca antes recibida, creando expectativas de solucionar parte de estos problemas en la región. La indefinición actual del contenido y alcances de ese tratado dificulta discutir con detalle sus efectos en el medio ambiente; no obstante, la importancia del tema amerita hacer algunas consideraciones. Este trabajo explora algunos aspectos importantes sobre este tema. Más que presentar un enfoque prospectivo, la intención es considerar elementos de su situación actual, que podrían ser importantes, y en algunos casos determinantes, en el crecimiento de la región fronteriza bajo un futuro Tratado de Libre Comercio. La primera parte del trabajo presenta un breve resumen de los problemas actuales en el medio ambiente de la frontera a la luz del TLC. Se da prioridad a los problemas ambientales generados por la industria, por ser en esta área donde se han centrado las críticas al TLC y por ser el campo donde el tratado probablemente tendrá mayores efectos -positivos o negativos- en el crecimiento de la frontera norte.ABSTRACTAny realistic perspective on the impact that a Free Trade Agreement between Mexico, the United States, and Canada will have on the enviroment in Mexico's northern border region must recognize that these effects could not be minimal. The delay in addressing existing environmental problems, the region's accelerated urban and population growth, and the vigorous economic growth which the trade agreements expected to stimulate are all obstacles to effectively controlling the trade agreement's potential negative impacts. Additional problems could emerge from the announced decentralization of some: of the environmental protection activities of Mexico's Ministry of Ecology and Urban Development (SEDUE). All this is taking place at a critical juncture of structural change in Mexico, which includes the NAFTA. While SEDUE'S decentralization may engender benefits over the medium and long term, it is very difficult to anticipate what the impacts will be over the short term (the next five years). Nevertheless, Mexico does have options for dealing with existing and future environmental problems along its northern border. The challenge is to identify these options and make use of them as quickly as posible. The measures that the Mexican and U.S. government have taken thus far are a first step in a process that must go beyond merely responding to political pressures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it