Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le projet de sonnet en hommage à l’auteur des Fleurs du mal que Nelligan a laissé sous le titre « Le tombeau de Charles Baudelaire » n’a guère retenu l’attention des commentateurs, qui n’en ont offert aucune lecture soutenue. Son style et son imaginaire insolites témoignent pourtant d’un travail d’élaboration — au sens psychique et artistique du mot — indéniable, même remarquable, qui confère à cette « ébauche » non seulement l’unité de structure nécessaire à son fonctionnement et à son authentification comme poème, mais surtout un rare degré d’originalité. L’auteur démontre qu’à travers l’esthétique étrangement « locale » ou « colloquiale » de ce poème, Nelligan essaie, par un ingénieux et paradoxal tour de main, de se positionner avantageusement dans l’espace symbolique de la modernité baudelairienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".