Cardiac actin changes in the actomyosin interface have different effects on myosin duty ratio
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an inherited cardiovascular disease (CD) that commonly causes an increased size of cardiomyocytes in the left ventricle. The proteins myosin and actin interact in the myocardium to produce contraction through the actomyosin ATPase cycle. The duty ratio (r) of myosin is the proportion of the actomyosin ATPase cycle that myosin is bound to actin and does work. A common hypothesis is that HCM mutations increase contraction in cardiac sarcomeres; however, the available data are not clear on this connection. Based on previous work with human α-cardiac actin (ACTC), we hypothesize that HCM-linked ACTC variants with alterations near the myosin binding site have an increased r, producing more force. Myosin duty ratios using human ACTC variant proteins were calculated with myosin ATPase activity and in-vitro motility data. We found no consistent changes in the duty ratio of the ACTC variants, suggesting that other factors are involved in the development of HCM when ACTC variants are present.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".