MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2764166240 · doi:10.1109/ccta.2017.8062573

Optimal switching surface design for switching LPV control and its application to air-fuel ratio control of an automotive engine

2017· article· en· W2764166240 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2017 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsController (irrigation)SPARK (programming language)Control theory (sociology)Particle swarm optimizationComputer scienceOptimization problemAutomotive industrySpark-ignition engineAutomotive engineeringMathematical optimizationControl (management)EngineeringMathematicsInternal combustion engineAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper formulates and solves the problem of optimizing switching surfaces (SSs) in switching LPV (SLPV) controller design to further enhance the control performance. The conditions for the SLPV controller synthesis under fixed SSs are first presented, which involves a finite number of linear matrix inequalities. The SS design problem is then formulated as an optimization problem where the cost function is evaluated by solving problems of SLPV controller synthesis under fixed SSs. An algorithm based on particle swarm optimization (PSO) is proposed to solve the SS design problem. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated on the air-fuel ratio control of a spark ignition engine in automobiles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it