MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2764191917 · doi:10.7202/1022521ar

La responsabilité des laïques dans l'action sociale

2014· article· fr· W2764191917 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Maurice Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueRelations industrielles · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le 22 septembre 1957, S.Exc. Mgr Maurice Roy, archevêque de Québec et primat de l'Eglise canadienne, prononçait le sermon à l'occasion de la messe traditionnelle qui précède le congrès annuel de la CTCC. Il a précisé le rôle des laïques catholiques dans l'action sociale. Si l'on tient compte du fait que les syndiqués à qui il s'adressait devaient discuter au cours de ce congrès de l'orientation de leur groupement avec des modifications de structure et même une affiliation éventuelle au CTC, les paroles du primat de l'Eglise canadienne prennent une résonance particulière. Les principes rappelés ne sont pas nouveaux, mais ils sont appliqués à un moment important dans l'évolution du mouvement ouvrier catholique de notre pays. Voilà pourquoi nous avons cru opportun de publier les principaux passages de cette allocution. Après avoir précisé la nature de l'Eglise, corps mystique du Christ, communauté vivante dans laquelle chacun des membres a une part active dans son édification et où chacun a sa part d'initiative que rien ne saurait remplacer, S.Exc. Mgr Roy poursuit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score0.882

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.025
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRelations industrielles→Same topicSocial Sciences and Governance→French-language works237,207→