La Qualite De Vie Au Travail Des Educatrices De la Petite Enfance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article traite de la qualite de vie au travail des educatrices de la petite enfance. Il presente les resultats d’une enquete realisee au Quebec aupres de 519 educatrices travaillant en centre de la petite enfance. Au total, cinq sources de stress (Boyle, Borg, Falzon, & Baglioni, 1995), cinq sources de bien-etre psychologique (Dagenais- Desmarais, 2010) et une mesure d’autonomie (Gillet, Rosnet, & Vallerand, 2008) au travail sont considerees. Dans l’ensemble, les resultats revelent un niveau de stress plutot bas et des niveaux de bien-etre et d’autonomie plutot eleves. Analyses par tranche d’experience, les resultats montrent que les cinq premieres annees au travail sont generalement suivies d’une augmentation du stress et d’une diminution du bien-etre psychologique. Ils montrent aussi que l’autonomie est fortement associee au bien-etre psychologique. Sur le plan pratique, ces resultats invitent les gestionnaires et les formateurs d’educatrices de la petite enfance a porter une attention particuliere aux premieres annees de vie professionnelle ainsi qu’a la preparation et a la mise en place de conditions favorables a l’exercice de l’autonomie au travail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".