MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2764282817 · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.4811.7367

Controle biológico clássico de pragas e a experiência da Embrapa na quarentena de bioagentes exóticos

2016· article· pt· W2764282817 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
L. A. N. de

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect behavior and control techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O controle biologico classico, refere-se a exploracao, introducao, criacao, liberacao, estabelecimento e colonizacao de inimigos naturais, com o objetivo de reduzir o nivel populacional de um determinado organismo indesejavel. Estes trabalhos envolvem a transferencia de organismos vivos de uma regiao para outra ou mesmo de um pais para outro, onde sempre se corre o risco de introduzir organismos indesejaveis, junto aos organismos beneficos. A necessidade de Estacao Quarentenaria e de primordial importância evitando-se assim a introducao de novas pragas, contaminantes, hiperparasitoides, plantas invasoras e fitopatogenos. O numero de especies importadas de organismos beneficos e outros fins no periodo de 1991-2015 pelo Laboratorio de Quarentena ?Costa Lima? (credenciado no pais pelo MAPA desde de 1991) da Embrapa Meio Ambiente, em Jaguariuna-SP foram de 773 especies, provenientes de 27 paises (Alemanha, Africa do Sul, Australia, Argentina, Benin, Canada, Costa Rica, Chile Cuba, Colombia, Espanha, Estados Unidos, Franca, Israel, Inglaterra, Japao, Holanda, Peru, Paraguai, Malasia, Mexico, Nova Zelândia, Quenia, Suica, Uruguai, Tailândia, Trinidad). As porcentagens de cada grupo de organismos beneficos importados foram de 38% de insetos (parasitoides, predadores), acaros predadores e nematoides entomopatogenicos e de 62% de microrganismos (fungos, virus e bacterias). O numero de estados da Federacao benificiados com essas introducoes para fins de controle biologico de pragas foram de 18. As porcentagens das demandas de registros dessas introducoes no pais foram de 52,17% pelas Empresas Publicas (Unidades da Embrapa e Institutos de Pesquisa), 24,36% Universidades, 17,40% Empresas Privadas e 5,8% pelas Cooperativas. Tambem O Laboratorio ?Costa Lima? colaborou nas exportacoes de 36 especies de organismos, sendo de 19 parasitoides (para EUA, Holanda, Japao), 16 acaros predadores (Africa, Sri Lanka, Colombia, Franca, Benin e Quenia) e um fungo (Africa e Colombia).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInsect behavior and control techniquesFrench-language works237,207