Competitiveness of Mediterranean Countries in the Olive Oil Market
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study employs constant market share analysis to determine the competitiveness of Turkey, Spain, Italy, Greece and Tunisia, i.e. the world’s primary olive oil producers, in markets in the USA, Australia, Canada, Brazil and Japan in the periods 2000-2004 and 2005-2008. The analysis shows that during the periods covered, Tunisia was the most competitive in the target markets. All countries showed decreased competitiveness during the periods analyzed. In the same period, although Greek export to target markets has increased, the competitiveness of Greece was adversely affected due to a decrease in its market share. The success in achieving sustainable and permanent international competitiveness in the olive oil market depends on production, organization and trade policies. Especially for Turkey, export strategies that consider the consumer demands and expectations in the destination markets should be developed. Finally, Turkey should introduce a new image for its national production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it