MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W276477423

Excerpts from Etc

2006· article· fr· W276477423 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Dennithorne Johnston

Bibliographic record

Venueet Cetera · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Information Literacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyAestheticsPsychologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(ProQuest Information and Learning: ... denotes formula omitted.) Between 1989 and 2006 Johns ton wrote more than 50 articles and short stories for ETC. The following excerpts were selected by Nora Miller in recognition of Johnston s retirement Editor. From: ESCAPE FROM A FROZEN UNIVERSE: Discovering General Semantics ... The problem of conflicting realities had long troubled me. In this article, I use term realities, rather than value-system, to suggest that most people possess little awareness of their immersion in a particular system. To them (and to me) there appears no choice of viewpoint, values or fact; it is way it is. My early reality I learned from my family. I valued certain abstractions: nature, taste, self-control, thrift, work, individualism, literature, art, etc., and distrusted others: artificiality, vulgarity, materialism, hedonism, waste, laziness, conformity, crowds, the system, etc. In Nassau, in my late teens, I had found new rules. People took pride in their ability to have a good time. A few years later, when I moved to England, I saw another set of realities, conflicting rules between classes and within classes. The middle class valued abstractions of refinement, proper behavior, good character, honor, justice, fair play, respectability. The working class seemed to hold in contempt many middle-class ideals, and to value, on one hand, independence and being clever rather than education or infrastructure, and, on other hand, security through loyalty to their betters. I heard working-class people use a vocabulary of absolutes, often spoken with great conviction, a vocabulary of it is. By contrast, middle-class speakers often used relativistic terms rather, perhaps, as it were, etc. Nevertheless, correct middle-class attitudes and behavior had importance of a moral imperative: It isn't done, It's not proper, etc. Not thoroughly schooled in reality of either class, I sometimes did not what to think or do. I felt trapped by absolutisms of my upbringing and by those of my new environment, and I could imagine no escape. One profound difference between my reality and British reality lay in attitude toward individual potential. In an American elementary school I had learned democratic ideal; I recall my first-grade teacher telling us, Anyone can grow up to be president. My ancestors left Britain and Ireland to escape personal and economic oppression of a stratified society. In Canada, my grandfather took his family west to homestead virgin territory. The pioneering spirit permeated my own experience of our family's move to isolated islands in Bahamas. With my North-American belief in individuality, I could not accept English view that a person should never try to rise above his station. Thus, general semantics theory that we abstract what we think we explained to me source of conflicting realities and removed many doubts about my own ability to perceive social world. As I studied, I sought to remain aware that my own perceptions come from abstracting. I began using general semantics principles in my daily life, including tools for thought: So far I know, Up to a point, To me, What, When, and Where indices. I saw knowledge an abstraction, no longer a holy grail.... ETC, VOL. 46, NO. 2, SUMMER 1989 From: SUCCESS, GHOSTS, AND THINGS ... Occasionally in life you'll succeed more than you should. Success leaves you feeling uneasy because you you shouldn't surpass your ghosts of judgments past. You don't enjoy your achievements. Compliments embarrass you. You feel it happened by a fluke, not through your ability. You feel guilty and tend to denigrate your success. Just luck, you say. You start thinking superstitiously - you know your good luck won't last. Once we realize that we've held ourselves back because of criticisms of past associates, we may feel an urge to blame them. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.015
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueet CeteraSame topicLibrary Science and Information LiteracyFrench-language works237,207