MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2764876686 · doi:10.1093/oq/kbi070

The Mines of Sulphur. Richard Rodney Bennett

2005· article· en· W2764876686 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joe K. Law

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Opera Quarterly · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Musicological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperaArt historyArtPerformance artSubject (documents)HistoryGeorge (robot)Library science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mines of Sulphur was Richard Rodney Bennett’s first full-length opera, having been preceded by The Ledge, a one-act chamber opera (1961), and The Midnight Thief, an operetta for children (1963). On the basis of these works, Bennett was commissioned to provide a new opera for the Aldeburgh Festival. As a possible subject, director Colin Graham suggested Scarlet Ribbons, a one-act play by Beverley Cross, who soon was asked to adapt his play for Bennett’s use. Fearing he would not have sufficient time to complete the work before the scheduled premiere, the composer withdrew from the commission (evidently there were no hard feelings, for the opera is dedicated to Benjamin Britten). The Mines of Sulphur had its premiere on 24 February 1965 at Sadler’s Wells, conducted by Colin Davis; it was toured throughout Great Britain (in Glasgow it was seen by a seventeen-year-old Stewart Robinson), and produced in Zagreb, Paris, Milan, Toronto, and New York (by the Juilliard School). Subsequently, apart from an Opera North revival in its 1978–79 season, it seems to have gone unperformed until this production at Glimmerglass in the summer of 2004, which was given five further performances at the New York City Opera in the fall of 2005.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Opera QuarterlySame topicDiverse Musicological StudiesFrench-language works237,207