IDENTIFYING THE PERSON: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE, St Antony's College, University of Oxford, 26-7 September 2009
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This two-day interdisciplinary conference represented the second annual meeting of ‘The Documentation of Individual Identity: Historical and Comparative Perspectives since 1500 (IdentiNet)’, an International Network of academics based in the History Faculty of the University of Oxford with sponsorship from the Leverhulme Trust. Established in 2008 by Jane Caplan (History, University of Oxford, UK) and Edward Higgs (History, University of Essex, UK), and facilitated by James Brown (University of Oxford, UK), the Network brings together academics from a variety of disciplinary and geographical settings in order to tell the story of individual identification within a long-term, comparative framework (see: http://identinet.org.uk). The conference was organized by Caplan, Higgs and Brown and held at St Antony’s College. It synthesized several themes within this rich and still relatively new field of enquiry, with a particular emphasis on the conceptual foundations of identification practices, exemplary case-studies, the transnational dimensions of identification and the implications of historical research for contemporary policy. With participants from ten countries, five continents and eight disciplines, drawn from the Network’s core membership and a wider pool of invited speakers, it was also intended from the outset to foster international and interdisciplinary perspectives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it