MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765016087

Frederic Lawrence Holmes

2005· article· en· W2765016087 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. L. Heilbron

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Philosophical Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy and History of Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLuckClassicsArt historyChemistryPhilosophyHistoryEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LARRY HOLMES was a historian of science of unusual rigor, range, productivity, and steadfastness. During year between diagnosis of his terminal illness and his death, he wrote one book and almost completed a second. The finished one, now published as Investigative Pathways: Patterns and Stages in Careers of Experimental Scientists (Yale, 2004), will almost certainly become his most widely read book. It a masterpiece of method. It gives illustrations from his lengthier works of his particular practice of excavating laboratory notebooks and other raw data to reconstruct course of scientific discovery. The unfinished volume, to be completed by colleagues, applies method to (as its working title has it) the pathway of Seymour Benzer into rll region. This last of a series beginning with Claude Bernard and Animal Chemistry (1974) and continuing through Lavoisier and Chemistry of Life (1985), Hans Krebs: Formation of a Scientific Life (1991), Hans Krebs: Architect of Intermediary Metabolism (1993), Lavoisier again (Antoine Lavoisier-The Next Crucial Year: Or, The Sources of His Quantitative Method in Chemistry, 1997), and a history of the most beautiful experiment in Meselson, Stahl, and Replication of DNA (2001). This list ignores an unpublished book-length manuscript on Justus von liebig, on which Holmes worked while engaged with Bernard and Lavoisier. Holmes's scholarly itinerary shows same sorts of twists and turns, opportunism, luck, privileged access, flashes of insight, hard work, and higher purpose that he found in his scientists' journeys. His higher purpose, bond that tied his diverse investigations together, was to understand scientific creativity. He did not care to write full biographies, even full intellectual biographies; only portions of careers leading to major discoveries commanded his sustained attention. Holmes was born in Cincinnati, Ohio, where he attended high school. He graduated from MIT in 1954 with a major in quantitative biology, then switched to Harvard and to history. After two years in Air Force, he returned to finish his M.A. (in 1958). He then switched again, to history of science (Ph.D., Harvard, 1962). In 1964, following two years of teaching in MIT's Department of Humanities, he moved to Yale as assistant professor (and was promoted to associate professor without tenure in 1968) in Department of History of Science and Medicine. In 1972, still without tenure at Yale, he accepted a professorship at University of Ontario. He returned to Yale in 1979 as professor and chair of a section in history of medicine in School of Medicine that had been founded to fill space vacated by closing of department he had joined fifteen years earlier. Recently Holmes was instrumental in creating a Program in History of Science and Medicine conducted by faculty from his section and from history department. I first met Holmes in late 1960s at an annual gathering of History of Science Society. He invited me to breakfast. That amazed me. Real academics attending professional meetings need morning to recover from hard thinking of night before. Holmes could not spare time. At breakfast I had another surprise. He talked not only about his current work, but also about his plans for his next book, and for one after through half a dozen major ones, and about effect he hoped they would have on profession. He stopped and flashed his wonderful smile. And that, he said, is all I'll have time for. His count was almost exactly right. Holmes did not have precise topics of all his books in mind at that breakfast forty years ago. He did not pick his topics on basis of his prior knowledge of science or languages he would have to master. The availability of a detailed record was cardinal requirement; rest was historian's equivalent to building experimental apparatus. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Philosophical SocietySame topicPhilosophy and History of ScienceFrench-language works237,207