MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765080843 · doi:10.1063/1.4994219

Using magnetic charge to understand soft-magnetic materials

2017· article· en· W2765080843 on OpenAlexaff
A. S. Arrott, T. L. Templeton

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP Advances · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetizationCondensed matter physicsMagnetic fieldPhysicsMicromagneticsMagnetic energyDivergence (linguistics)Magnetic domainCharge (physics)Demagnetizing fieldMagnetostaticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is an overview of what the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equations are doing in soft-magnetic materials with dimensions large compared to the exchange length. The surface magnetic charges try to cancel applied magnetic fields inside the soft magnetic material. The exchange energy tries to reach a minimum while meeting the boundary conditions set by the magnetic charges by using magnetization patterns that have a curl but no divergence. It can almost do this, but it still pays to add some divergence to further lower the exchange energy. There are then both positively and negatively charged regions in the bulk. The unlike charges attract one another, but do not annihilate because they are paid for by the reduction in exchange energy. The micromagnetics of soft magnetic materials is about how those charges rearrange themselves. The topology of magnetic charge distributions presents challenges for mathematicians. No one guessed that they like to form helical patterns of extended multiples of charge density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP AdvancesSame topicTheoretical and Computational PhysicsFrench-language works237,207