MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765083513 · doi:10.7202/1041633ar

La naissance angoissée de l’Absolu : autour des Recherches sur l’essence de la liberté humaine et des Âges du monde de Schelling

2017· article· fr· W2765083513 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Étienne Pelletier

Bibliographic record

VenueLaval théologique et philosophique · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHumanities and Social Sciences
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Après la publication en 1809 de ses Recherches sur l’essence de la liberté humaine, Schelling s’attelle pendant plusieurs années à l’impossible projet des Âges du monde. Les deux démarches ont en commun une mise en récit de la naissance de l’Absolu hors de lui-même et l’angoisse qui l’accompagne. Après avoir exposé l’éternelle vie de l’Absolu, caractérisée par un désir angoissé vers l’être, je lie à l’angoisse la dimension narrative et l’anthropomorphisme assumé de ces écrits. Je termine en questionnant le statut mythique du récit que fait Schelling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.024
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.188
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaval théologique et philosophiqueSame topicHumanities and Social SciencesFrench-language works237,207