An analytic approach for the study of pulsar spindown
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this work we develop an analytic approach to study pulsar spindown. We use the monopolar spindown model by Alvarez and Carramiñana (2004 Astron. Astrophys . 414 651–8), which assumes an inverse linear law of magnetic field decay of the pulsar, to extract an all-order formula for the spindown parameters using the Taylor series representation of Jaranowski et al (1998 Phys. Rev . D 58 6300). We further extend the analytic model to incorporate the quadrupole term that accounts for the emission of gravitational radiation, and obtain expressions for the period P and frequency f in terms of transcendental equations. We derive the analytic solution for pulsar frequency spindown in the absence of glitches. We examine the different cases that arise in the analysis of the roots in the solution of the non-linear differential equation for pulsar period evolution. We provide expressions for the spin-down parameters and find that the spindown values are in reasonable agreement with observations. A detection of gravitational waves from pulsars will be the next landmark in the field of multi-messenger gravitational wave astronomy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".