MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765186099

GEO-SEQ Best Practices Manual. Geologic Carbon Dioxide Sequestration: Site Evaluation to Implementation - eScholarship

2004· article· en· W2765186099 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sally M. Benson, Larry R. Myer, Curtis M. Oldenburg, Christine Doughty, Karsten Pruess, Jennifer L. Lewicki, Mike Hoversten, Erica Gasperikova, Thomas M. Daley, E.L. Majer, M.J. Lippmann, Chin‐Fu Tsang, Kevin G. Knauss, James Johnson, W. Foxall, Abe Ramirez, R. L. Newmark, David Cole, Tommy J. Phelps, J. H. Parker, A. M. Palumbo, J. Horita, Seymour Fisher, Gerry Moline, Lynn Orr, Tony Kovscek, Knud Jessen, Y. Wang, Jianfeng Zhu, Murat Çakıcı, Susan Hovorka, Mark H. Holtz, Shinichi Sakurai, Bill Gunter, David Law, Bert van der Meer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNational laboratoryOak Ridge National LaboratoryWork (physics)Carbon sequestrationRidgeCoalEnvironmental scienceEngineeringLibrary scienceCarbon dioxideGeographyWaste managementCartographyEngineering physicsChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LBNL-56623 GEO-SEQ Best Practices Manual Geologic Carbon Dioxide Sequestration: Site Evaluation to Implementation GEO-SEQ Project Team Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Stanford University, University of Texas Bureau of Economic Geology, Alberta Research Council September 30, 2004 Earth Sciences Division Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720 This work was supported by the Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy, Office of Coal and Power Systems, of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC03-76SF00098.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.010
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2960.300

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207