Antecedents of Sustainable Organizing: Relationships between Organizational Culture and the TBL
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scholars and practitioners are embracing the triple bottom line (TBL) approach to sustainability, but there is little research that examines the antecedents of the three dimensions of sustainability–financial, social, and ecological. We examine whether the four types of culture identified in the Competing Values Framework–hierarchy, clan, market and adhocracy–are related to the relative emphasis a firm places on financial, social, and ecological sustainability. Further, we examine whether organizational culture predicts actual performance in the three dimensions of the triple bottom line. Our findings provide support for hypothesized links between the: hierarchy culture and an emphasis on financial well-being; clan culture and socially sustainable outcomes; and market culture and ecologically sustainable outcomes. We discuss implications for organizational culture, sustainability and the triple bottom line.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it