MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765210105 · doi:10.4000/studifrancesi.9774

L’édification posthume de Ronsard en poète classique: de la consécration à la conservation

2017· article· fr· W2765210105 on OpenAlexaff
François Rouget

Bibliographic record

VenueStudi Francesi · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryArtconsLiteratureHumanitiesFolioMusicalArt historyPhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pierre de Ronsard died in 1585 leaving to posterity the massive volume in-folio of his Œuvres (Paris, G. Buon, 1584). In the subsequent nine editions published between 1587 and 1630, his editors augmented his poetry with commentaries and typographical components that enhanced his figure as a “classical” author. This article presents the various strategies explored by Ronsard’s editors to convey his image as the «Prince of poets». While preserving his poems in a faithful way that Ronsard defined before his death, his admirers seeked to disseminate his poetry through literary and musical anthologies as well as visual imagery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudi FrancesiSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207