MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765227569 · doi:10.1109/cpgps.2017.8075140

Loosely coupled visual odometry aided inertial navigation system using discrete extended Kalman filter with pairwise time correlated measurements

2017· article· en· W2765227569 on OpenAlexaff
Nilesh S. Gopaul, Jianguo Wang, Baoxin Hu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterOdometryCovarianceComputer scienceExtended Kalman filterCholesky decompositionInvariant extended Kalman filterCovariance intersectionAlgorithmCovariance matrixPairwise comparisonArtificial intelligenceFast Kalman filterNoise (video)Filter (signal processing)Computer visionControl theory (sociology)MathematicsStatisticsEigenvalues and eigenvectors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an algorithm for processing pairwise time-correlated measurements in a Kalman filter where the measurement vector at an epoch is correlated only with the measurement vector at the epoch before. Time-correlated errors are usually modelled by a shaping filter, which is here realized using Cholesky factors as coefficients derived from the variance and covariance matrices of the measurement noise vectors. Results with the simulated data show that the proposed approach performs better than the existing ones and provides more realistic covariance estimates. Furthermore, the proposed algorithm was applied to visual odometry aided-INS and the results show an improvement of 7% in the position drifts in comparison with the conventional shaping filter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207