MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765232743

The deformation and failure of hard rock : five case studies

2008· article· en· W2765232743 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kelvis Pérez

Bibliographic record

VenueKTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRock mass classificationGeologyDeformation (meteorology)Failure assessmentGeotechnical engineeringMining engineeringFracture (geology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report is a compilation of underground cases with observed and documented field data, where rock mass failure has occurred and deformation has been monitored. The cases presented within this report were selected on the basis of the following requirements: - Failure has occurred in the excavation as a result of stress- induced failure, structurally-controlled failure, or a combination of both. - Measurement of deformation has been conducted before and during both the excavation and time of the failure occurrence. The information presented in this report is based on documented information such as papers and articles, formal reports, theses, and communication via email with researchers and consultants. Five cases are presented in five chapters within this report: - Mine-by Experiment - Chapter 2. - Heathrow airport tunnel collapse - Chapter 3. - Instrumented drift at the Kiirunavaara mine - Chapter 4. - Arlandabanan tunnel - Shuttle station 2 - Chapter 5. - Äspö Pillar Stability Experiment - Chapter 6. The first two cases are tunnels from Canada and England and the last three cases are from Sweden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)Same topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207