EFFECT OF KINESIO TAPING WITH OPEN KINETIC CHAIN VERSUS CLOSED KINETIC CHAIN EXERCISE IN PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN SYNDROME.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Patellofemoral pain syndrome is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorder which affect an individual in third and fourth decades of life.Objective: The objective of the study is to compare the effectiveness of open kinetic chain and closed kinetic chain exercises along with the application of Kinesio taping in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome.Study design: Quasi experimental study design, Pre and Post test.Subjects: 30 Subjects diagnosed with patellofemoral pain syndrome with age group of 20-65 years of both the genders, having 4-7 of Visual Analogue Scale score.Intervention: 15 Subjects in Group-A received Kinesio taping with open kinetic chain exercise and 15 Subjects in Group-B received Kinesio taping with closed kinetic chain exercise.Results: The result of the study showed significant improvement in closed kinetic chain exercise along with the application of Kinesio tape.Conclusion: It was concluded that there was statistically significant improvement in closed kinetic chain exercise along with the application of Kinesiotaping , where there is a decrease in pain and increase in Range of motion, Muscle strength and Functional ability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".