EFFECT OF KINESIO TAPING WITH OPEN KINETIC CHAIN VERSUS CLOSED KINETIC CHAIN EXERCISE IN PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN SYNDROME.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Patellofemoral pain syndrome is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorder which affect an individual in third and fourth decades of life. Objective: The objective of the study is to compare the effectiveness of open kinetic chain and closed kinetic chain exercises along with the application of Kinesio taping in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Study design: Quasi experimental study design, Pre and Post test. Subjects: 30 Subjects diagnosed with patellofemoral pain syndrome with age group of 20-65 years of both the genders, having 4-7 of Visual Analogue Scale score. Intervention: 15 Subjects in Group-A received Kinesio taping with open kinetic chain exercise and 15 Subjects in Group-B received Kinesio taping with closed kinetic chain exercise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".