Quantifying Site-Specific Proton Dynamics in Phosphate Solid Acids by <sup>1</sup>H Double Quantum NMR Spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Solid-state magic angle spinning (MAS) NMR was used to investigate changes in proton dynamics in phosphate solid acids that exhibited increased proton conductivity between room temperature and 110 °C. Double quantum dipolar recoupling methods were used to quantify site-specific changes in proton–proton dipolar coupling as a function of temperature. The static dipolar coupling and motionally induced changes to it were compared. This was accomplished by calculating (from crystal structures) and measuring (from the initial parts of the DQ recoupling curves) the root-sum-square of the dipolar coupling, a geometry-independent measure of dipolar coupling strength referred to as the “apparent dipolar coupling”, D app . The analysis of KH 2 PO 4 and RbH 2 PO 4 showed that the experimentally determined apparent dipolar couplings were reduced from the calculated values at increased temperatures in dynamic systems. Higher proton conductivity was associated with greater reduction of the apparent dipolar coupling as measured by dipolar recoupling NMR methods. Most interestingly, in its monoclinic phase, RbH 2 PO 4 has two chemically distinct proton environments, one disordered and one ordered, which are resolved by 1 H MAS NMR. These sites exhibit different dipolar coupling responses as a function of temperature, revealing that proton conduction in this temperature range arises from motions involving only one of the sites. This site-specific dynamics is measured directly for the first time, using a combination of MAS to resolve the 1 H sites and dipolar recoupling experiments to probe the temperature dependence of the 1 H– 1 H dipolar interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".