MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765327207

A Biologically-Plausible Cognitive Model (BPCM) of Positive and Negative Congruency Effects in Masked Priming

2009· article· en· W2765327207 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmad Sohrabi, Robert West

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPriming (agriculture)CognitionCognitive psychologyNeuroscienceBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies have shown a positive priming effect with a short time between the prime and the target.The prime increases the performance on the target if they are congruent and decreases the performance when they are incongruent.Paradoxically, a negative priming effect has been found with a long time between the prime and the target.A major hypothesis argues that the prime initiates a motor self-inhibitory process that causes these effects.This hypothesis has been criticized and the model based on this hypothesis does not fit human data.A model was developed that fits the human data.It depends on attentional neuro-modulation not motor self-inhibition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFrench-language works237,207