MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765341748 · doi:10.1002/9781119158042.ch24

Flavors and Aromas: Chemistry and Biological Functions

2017· other· en· W2765341748 on OpenAlexaff
Charles F. Forney, Jun Song

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAromaFlavorChemistryPostharvestFood scienceOrganic chemistryBotanyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flavor and aroma are important characteristics that contribute to the quality of fresh fruits and vegetables. This chapter discusses the chemistry responsible for the flavor and aroma of fresh fruits and vegetable, explores the biochemical mechanisms by which they are formed, and identifies factors that affect flavor both pre- and postharvest. The chemical constituents of fruits and vegetables that provide the stimulus resulting in the perception of flavor and aroma are diverse. The volatile compounds that determine aroma and contribute to the flavor of fruits and vegetables are found in low concentrations, rarely exceeding 30 ppm, and the concentration of individual volatile compounds can vary widely. Esters contribute fruity aromas and flavors. Esters are formed by the esterification of carboxylic acid derivatives and alcohols. A variety of metabolic pathways have been shown to be involved in the synthesis of aroma and flavor compounds in fruits and vegetables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementFrench-language works237,207