MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765366888 · doi:10.1089/biores.2017.0020

Gut Microbiota and Salivary Diagnostics: The Mouth Is Salivating to Tell Us Something

2017· review· en· W2765366888 on OpenAlexafffund
Krishna Kodukula, Douglas V. Faller, David N. Harpp, Iphigenia Kanara, Julie Pernokas, Mark Pernokas, Whitney R. Powers, Nikolaos S. Soukos, Kosta Steliou, Walter H. Moos

Bibliographic record

VenueBioResearch open access · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral microbiology and periodontitis research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersUniversity of AlabamaMcGill UniversityAuburn UniversityMitoCure
KeywordsMicrobiomeHuman microbiomeBiologyHuman healthMetagenomicsOral MicrobiomeDysbiosisHost (biology)Diversity (politics)Gut microbiomeImmunologyEvolutionary biologyComputational biologyMedicineBioinformaticsEcologyGeneticsEnvironmental healthGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The microbiome of the human body represents a symbiosis of microbial networks spanning multiple organ systems. Bacteria predominantly represent the diversity of human microbiota, but not to be forgotten are fungi, viruses, and protists. Mounting evidence points to the fact that the "microbial signature" is host-specific and relatively stable over time. As our understanding of the human microbiome and its relationship to the health of the host increases, it is becoming clear that many and perhaps most chronic conditions have a microbial involvement. The oral and gastrointestinal tract microbiome constitutes the bulk of the overall human microbial load, and thus presents unique opportunities for advancing human health prognosis, diagnosis, and therapy development. This review is an attempt to catalog a broad diversity of recent evidence and focus it toward opportunities for prevention and treatment of debilitating illnesses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesOpen science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0150.001
Open science0.0160.027
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.530
GPT teacher head0.614
Teacher spread0.083 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioResearch open accessSame topicOral microbiology and periodontitis researchFrench-language works237,207