MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765369692 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23058

Enhanced fault detection for nonlinear processes using modified kernel partial least squares and the statistical local approach

2017· article· en· W2765369692 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Li Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPartial least squares regressionNonlinear systemKernel (algebra)Fault detection and isolationComputer scienceDimension (graph theory)AlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)GaussianArtificial intelligenceMathematicsMachine learningPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Conventional kernel partial least squares (KPLS) may not function well for detecting incipient faults in nonlinear processes. In relation to existing work, a new statistical local approach based KPLS monitoring strategy is proposed by integrating the statistical local approach into a modified KPLS framework. The advantages of the proposed technique are that (i) the new score variables constructed in the statistical local approach approximately follow Gaussian distribution, in spite of the distribution that the original data follow; (ii) after whitening of the data using KPCA, the dimension of modelling space is greatly reduced, which will definitely improve the computing speed. The new method shows more effective and sensitive performance for detecting incipient faults or slow changes of processes. This is demonstrated by a simulation numerical example and recorded data from a non‐isothermal CSTR process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207