Evaluación de la gestión y uso de la información de la Guía Digital del Patrimonio Cultural de Andalucía
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desde su creación en 1989, uno de los objetivos fundamentales del Instituto Andaluz del Patrimonio Histórico ha sido poner la información del patrimonio cultural generada por las administraciones públicas al servicio de la ciudadanía. La difusión de esta información a través de la Guía Digital del Patrimonio Cultural de Andalucía ayuda a conocer y, por lo tanto, valorar el patrimonio cultural con carácter general pero también permite, a partir de los datos que ofrece, apoyar investigaciones que generan nuevo conocimiento. Como resultado de un análisis bibliográfico y de otros parámetros de uso de la información, se ofrece en este trabajo una aproximación a su valoración por parte de distintos colectivos profesionales y de la ciudadanía en general.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.031 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.022 |
| Open science | 0.015 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.015 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it