Target-oriented Benchmarking of Regional Building Energy Consumption Based on the Lorenz Curve
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the purpose of building energy efficiency, the regional building energy benchmarking is indispensable for a district at planning stage. In this paper, a new approach is proposed by the combination of quota-level analysis and Lorenz curve, instead of the traditional simulation or coarse estimation by indicators. Firstly, the cumulative probability method was conducted to achieve a quota-level table, based on the data from State Grid and field surveys of 38 hotel buildings in the city of Hangzhou. At the same time, the Lorenz curve was introduced to de-scribe the distributed inequality of regional energy consumption. Finally, together with other planning parameters, the regional energy benchmarking was accomplished by accumulation between the given upper and lower EUI limitations along with the Lorenz curve. It should be noted that the pre-set EUI restrictions based on the quota-level analysis can directly represent the requested targets of building energy efficiency at planning stage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it