Anti-Jamming Communications Using Spectrum Waterfall: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This letter investigates the problem of anti-jamming communications in a dynamic and intelligent jamming environment through machine learning. Different from existing studies which need to know (estimate) the jamming patterns and parameters, we use the temporal and spectral information, i.e., the spectrum waterfall, directly. First, to cope with the challenge of infinite state of spectrum waterfall, a recursive convolutional neural network is designed. Then, an anti-jamming deep reinforcement learning algorithm is proposed to obtain the optimal anti-jamming strategies. Finally, simulation results validate the proposed approach. The proposed algorithm does not need to model the jamming patterns, and naturally has the ability to explore the unknown environment, which implies that it can be widely used for combating dynamic and intelligent jamming.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it