Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Rondo for the HarpSophia Dussek (1775–1847) Katelyn Clark (bio) Sophia Dussek (née Corri) was a Scottish-born composer and musician of Italian descent who spent a large portion of her active career in London. Her early music instruction was taken with her father, music publisher and composer Domenico Corri; after moving to London in 1788, she studied with Luigi Marchesi and Giambattista Cimador. Dussek was a highly accomplished performer on harp, pianoforte, and voice from an early age, and she had her London début at the prestigious Salomon concerts in 1791. Her published oeuvre includes an impressive array of concert works for harp, pianoforte sonatas, and a variety of smaller works intended for the domestic market, including A Rondo for the Harp in E-flat major. The rondo was published in Pleyel, Corri, & Dussek’s Musical Journal, no. 3 (1797) and can be performed on either the harp or the pianoforte. Its elegant composition reflects many typical features popular in English writing of the time, including an Alberti-type bass accompaniment, delicate détaché scales as linking passages, and dramatic octaves. The rondo includes a highly affective C-minor passage (from m. 64) reminiscent of Dussek’s Harp Sonata in C minor, op. 2, no. 3 (1794). [End Page 101] Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page 106] Katelyn Clark katelyn clark is a Canadian historical keyboard specialist based out of Montréal, Québec, and a doctoral candidate in historical musicology at the University of Toronto Faculty of Music. Her work explores late eighteenth-century London pianoforte culture, examining the intersection of musical publication and canon formation, the gender dynamics of keyboard performance and place, and technological developments of the English keyboard. Her research is funded through Fonds de recherche du Québec – Société et culture. Copyright © 2017 Suzanne G. Cusick
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".