MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765540589 · doi:10.1109/icices.2017.8070736

Using wide area monitoring WSN

2017· article· en· W2765540589 on OpenAlexaff
Sonar Padwal, Ashwini Holkar, Shubhangi Khote, Prajakta Maral, Vidya Kadam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkContinuous monitoringComputer scienceAir monitoringHazardous wasteAir quality indexSample (material)Smart cityTransport engineeringInternet of ThingsEnvironmental scienceReal-time computingMeteorologyEngineeringComputer securityGeographyEnvironmental engineeringComputer networkOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advent of ultra technological devices in our day to day lives has made us smart and efficient. Such a transformation is required for any developing city for efficient management of citywide activities and Become a smart city. By the use of wireless sensor nodes, various types of data can be collected like weather conditions, sound and air quality and data of high priority structures. Such data would also be useful monitoring and surveillance. We propose a sample integrated system that can be used as per requirement for monitoring of weather conditions like temperature, humidity and rain and air quality for detection of hazardous gasses. Also, to prevent accidents or structural disasters of flyovers and bridges, we include a load cell to present continuous monitoring of these structures. The city administration can benefit from this data for all important planning and decision making and users would use it for managing their day-wide activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207