MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765554585 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2017-0150

Thermal properties of engineered barriers for a Canadian deep geological repository

2017· article· en· W2765554585 on OpenAlex
Pedram Abootalebi, Greg Siemens

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
FundersMinistère de la Défense NationaleNuclear Waste Management Organization
KeywordsSpent nuclear fuelEnvironmental scienceRadioactive wasteBentoniteMoistureThermalNuclear engineeringNuclear powerMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringWaste managementGeologyMeteorologyEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global energy needs continue to rise along with society’s desire for carbon-reduced energy sources to limit climate change effects. One viable carbon-reduced energy source is nuclear power, which provides more than half the electricity requirements of the province of Ontario. Within Canada there are more than 2.5 million bundles of spent nuclear fuel, which will be stored in a deep geological repository. Efficiency of the repository system depends on dissipation of thermal energy. A comprehensive experimental study is presented on thermal properties of barrier materials. The influence of bentonite type, variability, moisture, and temperature on thermal properties is examined. Results show strong influence of moisture on thermal properties, some influence of temperature on low-density bentonite, minor influence of bentonite type, as well as low variability in the experimental measurements. The extensive database of physical measurements is compared with values from the literature and then used to statistically evaluate thermal property models selected from the literature. Using the base parameters from the literature, thermal property models performed adequately; however, soil-specific calibration of the model inputs improved the fit significantly. These results are now available to perform the numerical models for the proposed Canadian deep geological repository for used nuclear fuel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it