Multivariate genome-wide association study of rapid automatized naming and rapid alternating stimulus in Hispanic and African American youth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Reading disability is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder that is characterized by difficulties in reading despite educational opportunity and normal intelligence. Performance on rapid automatized naming (RAN) and rapid alternating stimulus (RAS) tests gives a reliable predictor of reading outcome. These tasks involve the integration of different neural and cognitive processes required in a mature reading brain. Most studies examining the genetic factors that contribute to RAN and RAS performance have focused on pedigree-based analyses in samples of European descent, with limited representation of groups with Hispanic or African ancestry. In the present study, we conducted a multivariate genome-wide association analysis to identify shared genetic factors that contribute to performance across RAN Objects, RAN Letters, and RAS Letters/Numbers in a sample of Hispanic and African American youth (n=1,331). We then tested whether these factors also contribute to variance in reading fluency and word reading. Genome-wide significant, pleiotropic, effects across RAN Objects, RAN Letters, and RAS Letters/Numbers were observed for SNPs located on chromosome 10q23.31 (rs1555839, multivariate association, p=2.23 × 10 −8 ), which also showed significant association with reading fluency and word reading performance (p <0.001). Bioinformatic analysis of this region using epigenetic data from the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium indicates active transcription of the gene RNLS in the brain. Neuroimaging genetic analysis of fourteen cortical regions in an independent sample of typically developing children across multiple ethnicities (n=690) showed that rs1555839 was associated with variation in volume of the right inferior parietal cortex—a region of the brain that processes numerical information and has been implicated in reading disability. This study provides support for a novel locus on chromosome 10q23.31 associated with RAN, RAS, and reading-related performance. AUTHOR SUMMARY Reading disability has a strong genetic component that is explained by multiple genes and genetic factors. The complex genetic architecture along with diverse cognitive impairments associated with reading disability, poses challenges in identifying novel genes and variants that confer risk. One method to begin parsing genetic and neurobiological mechanisms that contribute to reading disability is to take advantage of the high correlation among reading-related cognitive traits like rapid automatized naming (RAN) and rapid alternating stimulus (RAS) to identify shared genetic factors that contribute to common biological mechanisms. In the present study, we used a multivariate genome-wide analysis approach that identified a region of chromosome 10q23.31 associated with variation in RAN Objects, RAN Letters, and RAS Letters/Numbers performance in a sample of 1,331 Hispanic and African American youth in the Genes, Reading, and Dyslexia (GRaD) Study. Genetic variants in this region were also associated with reading fluency in GRaD, and differences in brain structures implicated in reading disability in a separate sample of 690 children. The gene, RNLS , is located within the implicated region of chromosome 10q23.31 and plays a role in breaking down a class of chemical messengers known to affect attention, learning, and memory in the brain. These findings provide a basis to inform our understanding of the biological basis of reading disability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".