MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765612149 · doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000001416

Treatment and Resolution of Filamentary Keratitis in a Patient with Stiff Person Syndrome

2017· article· en· W2765612149 on OpenAlexaff
Steven S. Bae, Sonia N. Yeung, Clara C. Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueCornea · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British ColumbiaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlasmapheresisKeratitisDermatologyContact lensAzathioprineRefractory (planetary science)OphthalmologySurgeryInternal medicineImmunologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To report a rare case of filamentary keratitis associated with stiff person syndrome. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: A 26-year-old woman with several autoimmune conditions was referred because of filamentary keratitis. Conservative management using lubrication, mucolytics, and bandage contact lenses failed to adequately relieve symptoms. Despite the addition of oral prednisone, cyclosporine, and azathioprine, the patient's condition persisted with numerous filaments and severe dry eye. One month later, the patient had an episode of sudden muscle cramps in her back, for which she was hospitalized. Investigations revealed a diagnosis of stiff person syndrome, positive for glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies. Plasmapheresis and high-dose intravenous steroids were provided as initial therapy. On follow-up, her filamentary keratitis resolved and at the last visit, her ocular symptoms had completely resolved. CONCLUSIONS: Filamentary keratitis is a chronic, recurrent condition that can be challenging to treat. Effective management requires careful consideration of possible predisposing causes, especially in refractory cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCorneaSame topicAutoimmune Neurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207