MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765615373 · doi:10.5334/ijic.3678

Can we predict your future? Using scores to predict length of stay and discharge destination

2017· article· en· W2765615373 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah Mc Nally, Roisin Howlin, Annette Kehoe, Sarah Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Integrated Care · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAuditStroke (engine)CohortMontreal Cognitive AssessmentAcute carePopulationEmergency medicineCase mix indexPhysical therapyPediatricsCognitionHealth careCognitive impairmentNursingInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: This audit was completed within a large teaching hospital in Dublin, St Vincents University Hospital. The cohort of patients are those admitted with an acute stroke under the care of the Stroke Multidisciplinary Team, with confirmed stroke on CTBrain/MRI.Problem: It has always been assumed that poor cognitive scores were associated with longer lengths of stays and increased likelihood of discharge to a location other than the patient’s home. Stroke patients can often wait months to access appropriate care packages, further rehab settings or long term care beds resulting in significant costs as well as causing frustration for patients and their families alike. Achieving safe, timely and person centred discharge from hospital to home is an important indicator of quality and a measure of effective and integrated care (Joint Improvement Team, HSE 2014)Improvement related question: We set out to confirm if early cognitive screening of acute stroke patients in a large Dublin teaching hospital could predict their discharge destination and length of stay. This has never been examined previously within an Irish/UK stroke population using a standardised cognitive assessment (MoCA).Methods: We completed a retrospective audit using paper count method on the charts of 120 newly diagnosed stroke patients admitted to St Vincent's University Hospital over a six month period. The proforma gathered information on patient sex, age, date of admission, length of stay, CT/MRI results, admission Barthel, MOCA score on initial assessment, discharge Barthel score and discharge destination.Intervention/Results: 120 patients were included in the audit with a confirmed stroke on CTB/MRI. The average age was 73. There were 52 males and 68 females and the average length of stay was 44 days.Of the 49 patients that scored within mild-no cognitive impairment, 90% (n=44) went home from SVUH, 2% to further rehab, 6% to LTC and 2% died . The average length of stay for this cohort is 17 days.Of those that scored within the mild- moderate cognitive impairment (n=37) 30% went home, 40% went for further rehab, 27% went to LTC and 3% died. The average length of stay for this group was 49 days (more than twice the first group).Of those that scored within moderate – severe cognitive impairment, 12% went for further rehab, 63% to long term care and 25% died and 0% went home.Their average length of stay was 90days, nearly five times longer than the first cohort.Not every patient was able to complete a standardised cognitive assessment.42% of these patients went to long-term care and 35% died. This cohorts average length of stay was 82 days, with a the number of deaths shortly after admissionLessons Learnt: The results of this audit confirm that early cognitive screening can help predict discharge destination and length of stay. Early cognitive screening (as recommended in the Royal College Of Physicians Stroke guidelines) are completed within 24 hours of admission to SVUH. Therefore the multidisciplinary has a strong indicator of discharge destination and length of stay early in the course of the patient’s hospital stay. With an increasing emphasis on the delivery of appropriate allocation of resources and constant pressures on delivering cost effective care it is estimated this knowledge will have significant cost saving benefits. This information is also imperative in early planning to reduce the number of delayed discharges.Effects of changes: As a multidisciplinary team we now use these early cognitive scores prospectively, to inform discharge arrangements and the timeliness of interventions for newly diagnosed stroke patients. Family meetings are now arranged within two weeks of admissions as standard, meaning families/NOK are also informed and involved in effective early discharge planning, allowing for a more seamless discharge.We anticipate that this focus on early scores might assist in the better distribution of healthcare resources in the hospital setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Integrated CareSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207