MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765630539 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckx189.270

Social determinants in dental health of young Chinese immigrant children in British Columbia, Canada

2017· article· en· W2765630539 on OpenAlexaffabout
H Gao, Brenda T. Poon, Rosamund Harrison, Kavita R. Mathu‐Muju

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationSocial determinants of healthMedicinePolitical scienceDemographyGerontologySociologyPublic healthNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Immigrant children are disproportionately affected by dental caries worldwide. Limited research has examined the factors influencing the dental care of children from Chinese immigrant families. This qualitative study examines the multi-level factors associated with dental health and care practices of young Chinese immigrant children (ages 0-6) in British Columbia, Canada. Methods Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with parents (n = 15), dental professionals (n = 4), and social service providers (n = 3) recruited in Vancouver and Richmond, British Columbia. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Major barriers include: (1). Economic. High cost and no dental insurance discourage access to professional dental services (2). Language. Inadequate language proficiency and lack of translated resources limit access to accurate dental care information (3). Culture. Lack of awareness of importance of dental care in early years prevent early dental care for children. Key facilitators are: (1). Community. Dental promotional programs support families to initiate and maintain effort in dental home care for children (2). Social network. Friends and family members support by being directly involved in care or providing advice (3). Dental professionals. Dental visits or community dental programs are opportunities for soliciting feedback on the adequacy of dental home care practices. Conclusions (1). Insurance. Government provides dental insurance for purchase at subsidized rates by income levels. (2). Information. Health professionals develop consistently translated dental care information with culturally-appropriate recommendations targeting first-time parents and broader immigrant community (3). Community engagement. Community partners use existing community network and social media to engage immigrant parents in early dental care for children. Key messages: Dental public health professionals may improve care provision with enhanced understandings of the common challenges faced and supports needed by the Chinese immigrant families with young children. Study findings contribute to inform improvement in current dental public health programs to better engage Chinese immigrant families in caring for children’s dental health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicGlobal Health Workforce IssuesFrench-language works237,207