GENOGRAMA E ECOMAPA: REPRESENTAÇÃO ESTRUTURAL DA FAMÍLIA NO CUIDADO COTIDIANO DAS SEQUELAS DO AVC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A família, como núcleo dinâmico e ao mesmo tempo a mais constante unidade de saúde, tem papel fundamental para acompanhar os processos de saúde-doença. O genograma e o ecomapa podem subsidiar a enfermagem numa prática avançada no cuidado, pensando e agindo com e para a família. Visou-se, nesse estudo identificar e analisar a representação estrutural de uma família a partir do genograma e ecomapa no cuidado cotidiano do sequelado de Acidente Vascular Cerebral. Utilizou-se a técnica de entrevista semiestruturada, a partir da proposta de avaliação estrutural do Modelo Calgary de Avaliação da Família. Os resultados mostram que o genograma e o ecomapa apresentaram pistas para a intervenção de enfermagem na saúde pública, como um instrumento para auxiliar os membros da família a compreender a importância das relações internas e externas, e a explorar as mesmas, em benefício do paciente.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".