MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765654163 · doi:10.5006/2370

The Influence of Coating Thickness and Composition on the Corrosion Propagation Rates of Galvanized Rebar in Cracked Concrete

2017· article· en· W2765654163 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCORROSION · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsGalvanizationMaterials scienceCorrosionRebarMetallurgyCoatingChlorideCarbon steelSteel barComposite materialLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study has been conducted of the chloride-induced corrosion behavior of four different batches of galvanized steel reinforcement embedded in sound and in cracked concrete. One batch of bars was of conventionally produced hot-dipped galvanized (HDG) steel, two were prototypes of continuously galvanized rebar, and the fourth was a hot-dipped bar with an experimental Zn-Al alloy coating. Carbon (black) steel bars were also tested for comparison purposes. The continuously galvanized process is aimed at producing a thinner, but more ductile coating than that formed by conventionally hot-dipped galvanizing process. Metallographic examination of the as-received galvanized bars showed a wide variation of the coating thickness around and along the bars, and the continuously galvanized coatings were consistently thinner than specified. All bars were cast in concrete which was subsequently cracked either parallel to or perpendicular to the embedded bars. Additional specimens were tested in the sound (non-cracked) concrete. All specimens were constantly exposed to a chloride brine for 64 weeks, and were electrochemically assessed bi-weekly during the exposure period. The electrochemical results and visual examination after autopsy showed that no active corrosion was initiated in either the galvanized or black rebar reinforced non-cracked concrete specimens. Therefore, the data in this project give no indication of initiation time or chloride threshold concentration for corrosion of these bars. On the other hand, in all cracked concrete specimens, corrosion initiated at the base of the crack and extended along or around the bars. In the cracked specimens, all galvanized bars exhibited lower current densities than the black bars, with the HDG being the lowest. Recommendations are given for appropriate interpretation of half-cell potentials of the galvanized bars investigated in terms of high or low probability of active corrosion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it