MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765659881 · doi:10.46311/2318-0579.1.euj338

Perfil de pacientes acamados da Unidade de Saúde Quebec, em Maringá - Paraná

2004· article· pt· W2765659881 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Uningá · 2004
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Nursing, Elderly Care
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicineGynecologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo tem por pressuposto traçar o perfil de pacientes que necessitam deatendimento domiciliar, sabendo que a maior parte destes são idosos e encontram-seacamados, através de pesquisa desses indivíduos relacionados no Programa Saúde daFamília. Foram realizadas visitas domiciliares semanais e aplicado um questionáriosemi-aberto, bem como inspeção e coleta de dados vitais. Observou-se que a médiageral de acometimentos associados foi um traço importante do perfil, com maiorpercentual de AVE com 75%; fratura de colo de fêmur, 10 %; Parkinson, 5%; esclerose,10% e dificuldade de locomoção, 37%. Devido às alterações observadas advindas doacamamento, pode-se concluir a importância e necessidade de traçar um perfil coerentedos pacientes acamados e de suas alterações relacionadas, para que se possa, no futuro,elaborar boas condutas de tratamento e prevenção.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it