MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Developing GIS Database for Support Fire Prevent and Fighting in Govap District – Ho Chi Minh City Base on Network Analyst

2017· article· en· W2765672476 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueVNU Journal of Science Earth and Environmental Sciences · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEvacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPartenariat Canadien Contre Le Cancer
KeywordsScope (computer science)Service (business)DatabaseHo chi minhOrder (exchange)Computer scienceComputer securityGeographyBusinessCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper refers to the study, using network analysis in developing a database to support the Fire prevent and fighting (FPF). The network analysis system will support the fire protection agencies determine the fire point location, find the optimal route to approach the fire location, find the location of water points near fire or define the scope of fire protection service stations, ... in order to maneuver planning when the problem occurred. Base on the analysis, we develop an empirical database in Go Vap District - Ho Chi Minh City and deployed some solutions to support the fire protection agencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVNU Journal of Science Earth and Environmental SciencesSame topicEvacuation and Crowd DynamicsFrench-language works237,207