Workshop on Literature in Cognition and Computers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Workshop on Literature in Cognition and Computers 26 July, 2006, 1:30 – 5:00 p.m. Keywords: Literature, text, aesthetics, rhetoric, metaphor Introduction The Workshop on Literature in Cognition and Computers is a workshop intended as a forum for the exchange of activity reports among cognitive science researchers interested in literature, aesthetics, and arts. The goal of the workshop is to gather research experiences from various disciplines for discussion, as well as to focus on opening up an interesting future for literature and cognitive science research. As literature represents one of the ultimate products of high-order cognitive processes, studies of literature can reveal ultimate aspects of human thought, values, evaluations and affective processes. Aims and Scope Topics at the workshop will include: - Literature theories and cognitive science - Computational approaches to literary text - Appreciation and creation of literary text - Cognitive aesthetics - Hyper-media - Other types of artistic media (including film, music, fine arts) and cognitive science The goal of the workshop is to gather research experiences from various disciplines for discussion, as well as to focus on opening up an interesting future for literature and cognitive science research. As literature represents one of the ultimate products of high-order cognitive processes, studies of literature can reveal ultimate aspects of human thought, values, evaluations and affective processes. responses can be regarded as high-order cognitive responses and are very unique among emotions. When kandoh is evoked, people often change their cognitive frameworks, thoughts, and attitudes. Our research is seeking to elucidate the mechanisms that evoke kandoh and their various influences. Yoshimine, N. (Shonan International Women's College) Reconstruction of Fictional Worlds and the Role of Inferences: The cognitive mechanisms of fiction understanding enable the reader to construct a consistent situational model of the story world. As the text provides no explicit instructions concerning the inferential rules for establishing situations, the reader must make inferences by utilizing both various textual clues and their existing knowledge-base. Various types of reader inferential strategies are illustrated by simulation experiments implemented with a semantic network processing system (SNePS). Session 2: Research Papers [submitted papers] Refereed research papers will be presented here. Session 3: Literature and Vancouver Vancouver has produced a treasure trove of literary authors, including William Gibson (Neuromancer) and Douglas Coupland (Generation X). We will take a cognitive look at this thrilling tradition, with the help of literary scholars. Participation and Registration CogSci 2006 participants will be welcome and invited to join the workshop. To participate in the workshop, please first register with CogSci 2006. Program Proceedings Session 1: Approaches to Literature [position papers] Iwagaki, M. Figurative Techniques for Metamorphosing Stories into Literary Works: As we use computers to create stories and wish to metamorphose them into literary works, figurative forms of expression can be very advantageous. Utsumi, A. (Uni. of Electro-Communications) Poetic Appreciation of Metaphor and Simile: This paper presents an empirical study of whether metaphors and similes differ in poetic appreciation and what causes such differences. Kanai, A. (Hosei Uni.) Rhetoric, Non-Story, and Transition: The reality effects of narrative are caused by the interaction between cognitive process and story and non- story rhetorical aspects. In this paper, we discuss the transition in cognitive process caused by non-story aspects of rhetoric. Tokaji, A. (Hiroshima Uni.) Mechanisms of evoking kandoh responses: Our recent studies have focused on emotional responses called kandoh (state of being profoundly-moved emotionally) in Japanese. These The workshop will publish proceedings separately from the CogSci2006. Registered participants of the workshop can receive the proceedings at the workshop site. Literary Walk After the workshop, the participants will be able to take part in a literary walk, in which we will visit several locations with connections to literary works or literary authors. Contact and Web Site E-mail: iwlcc@valdes.titech.ac.jp Web site: http://www.valdes.titech.ac.jp/~iwlcc/ Organizing and Program Committee Akifumi Tokosumi (Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan) Akihito Kanai (Hosei University, Japan) Naoko Matsumoto (Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan) Akira Utsumi (University of Electro-Communications, Japan) Norikazu Yoshimine (Shonan Kokusai Women's College, Japan)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.111 | 0.035 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".